Obama’s desperate letter to the Iraqi ayatollah
The US president has reportedly written to Ayatollah Sistani to help
resolve Iraq’s political impasse. It’s a long shot
By Ranj Alaaldin
The Guardian, UK
Friday, August 6, 2010
Political paralysis continues in Iraq as it remains without a
government since the March parliamentary elections.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/26/iraq-election-result-anal…
With the holy month of Ramadan fast approaching within the week,
chances are that it will remain without one until September. The US,
however, is set to withdraw all combat troops at the end of August;
Obama and his administration want a government before that withdrawal
and it is desperate for results.
Obama has become so desperate that he has turned to the divine and
supreme: Foreign Policy magazine yesterday reported
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2010/08/05/obama_sent_a_secret_…
that the US president sent a personal letter to the influential and
powerful Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani, urging him to intervene and
resolve the impasse.
At times of political crises, Iraq’s clergy have proven to be useful;
it was Ayatollah Sistani who pushed for the landmark open-voting
system in the parliamentary elections, much to the dismay of Iraq’s
politicians but to the delight of their constituents; and it was
Sistani who intervened, with positive results, on key democratic and
constitutional issues, as well as the US-Iraq status of forces
agreement.
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/facility/sofa.htm
The clerical establishment, however, has been careful to not get its
hands dirty. Back in May, it was astute enough to stay clear of a
political agreement among elements of the major Shia coalition, the
Iraqi National Alliance (INA), which gave the establishment the final
say over any disputes between them.
Like he did with that agreement, Sistani may choose to stay clear of
the somewhat tainted game of political bargaining and government
formation. The clerical establishment may do well, actually, to
reject the possibility of getting heavily involved lest it associates
its name with what is likely to be a dysfunctional government.
Although the full contents of the letter is not known, what is
certain is that it does not contain any specific reference or
guidance as to how or in what manner Sistani should intervene. The
current impasse in Iraq is primarily the result of a failure to
achieve consensus on the next prime minister of the country.
Major Shia groupings the Islamic Supreme Council of Iraq (ISCI) and
the Sadrists, who belong to the INA coalition, as well as the Sunni-
dominated Iraqi National Movement of Ayad Allawi, reject another
Nouri al-Maliki premiership, who recently "froze" his candidacy for
the role until his competitors come up with a compromise candidate; a
bluff, of course, that may succeed since the INA is itself internally
divided on the issue.
The intricacies are, therefore, such that if any intervention from
the clerical establishment is to have any effective outcome, then it
must actually choose the next premier. This, however, would be out of
the question, since it would diminish altogether the sensitive line
between religion and politics (which Sistani has been careful to
avoid), and any political groupings that consequently suffer could
challenge the legitimacy of such a manoeuvre — and this would most
likely lead to irreparable violence and upheaval.
The letter from Obama to Sistani should simply be seen as the US
pulling out all the stops for an Iraqi government. However, should it
fail in its objective, which is quite likely, then it could be yet
another depressing sign of Washington’s diminishing influence in the
country.
More at:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2010/aug/06/obama-letter-ayat…
Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.