http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1362831/Only-ONE-FIVE-knife-o…

On Mar 4, 1:31 pm, Iconoclast <goldst…@nym.hush.com> wrote:

- — -

> Isn’t the purpose of SAT’s to screen out people who aren’t college
> material?  Why do like they do in failed Hispanic nations and dumb
> down colleges to the level of a middle-school in a Puerto Rican or
> Mexican barrio?

> http://www.nytimes.com/2011/03/04/nyregion/04remedial.html?src=me&ref…

> The City University of New York has long spent much of its energy and
> resources just teaching new students what they need to begin taking
> college-level courses.

> But that tide of remedial students has now swelled so large that the
> university’s six community colleges — like other two-year schools
> across the country — are having to rethink what and how they teach,
> even as they reel from steep cuts in state and local aid.

> About three-quarters of the 17,500 freshmen at the community colleges
> this year have needed remedial instruction in reading, writing or
> math, and nearly a quarter of the freshmen have required such
> instruction in all three subjects. In the past five years, a subset of
> students deemed “triple low remedial” — with the most severe deficits
> in all three subjects — has doubled, to 1,000.

> The reasons are familiar but were reinforced last month by startling
> statistics from state education officials: fewer than half of all New
> York State students who graduated from high school in 2009 were
> prepared for college or careers, as measured by state Regents tests in
> English and math. In New York City, the proportion was 23 percent.

 The Shithousing of America.

.

Do you need investigative services in Russia or anywhere else in the former Soviet Union?

Business?
Personal?
Professional?
Adoption?
Investment?
Due Diligence?
Background Check?

Contact us…

http://www.rada-llc.com

Russia Ukraine Moldova Belarus Armenia Azerbaijan Georgia Latvia Lithuania
Estonia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzstan Tajikistan Turkmenistan Uzbekistan Poland Romania
Czech Republic Slovakia Iran

See:
https://lh4.googleusercontent.com/_n29_cd0lVTo/TXEprDQK67I/AAAAAAAAPI…

>As usual, you left out the part about the IDF eating their
palestinian
>prey after they kill them.  It’s the reason the dead palestinian
>numbers are so low and the missing count is so high.

Nonsense. Pallies haul them away to their top restaurants.

Cider-Braised Palestinian Kid

8 small sage leaves
1 Palestinian Kid (can substitute pork, rattlesnake, or vulture)
2 Tbsp. chicken fat
1 medium onion, chopped coarsely
1 carrot, chopped coarsely
1 small turnip, chopped coarsely
2 cups apple cider or apple juice
1 bouquet garni made by tying together
3 sprigs of parsley, 2 sprigs of thyme and 1/2 bay leaf
1/4 cup parsley, chopped

Divide the sage leaves into equal portions and dress the kid.
In a large flameproof casserole, melt the fat over a high flame.
Brown the kid in the melted fat, and then remove and reduce the flame.
Add the onion, carrot and turnip, cover and let simmer for an hour.
Place the kid on vegetables and pour on the cider.
Bring to a boil, add the bouquet garni, cover and transfer to a medium
oven for 2 hours.
Remove the kid from the casserole and set aside to keep warm.
Strain the liquids in the casserole, pressing down on the vegetables
to squeeze out the liquids.
Place the kid on a warmed serving platter, pour over some of the
juices and sprinkle with the parsley.
Serve the remaining juices separately.

Serves lots of Pallies.

Deborah

——-  ——–  ——–

  Google docs

       http://tinyurl.com/laotxj

       http://tinyurl.com/55vesj

  http://www.freewebs.com/fourthreichisrael/zionistrecipe.htm

  http://www.freewebs.com/fourthreichisrael/independent_sharon.jpg

  http://jewsdisgustedbyzionism.blogspot.com/

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_xyFBCJsSkts/SMw2bXtnLII/AAAAAAAAAB8/U_b-rvq…

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_xyFBCJsSkts/SMivujjgyrI/AAAAAAAAABk/1NtIg_E…

AN INSULT TO MAYNMARS AND THEIR CULTURE.

Here is not the news, which is a pure insult to all Myanmars .

Why Did Burma’s Leader Appear on TV in Women’s Clothes?
TIME by Robert Horn / Bangkok – Sun Feb 27, 12:45 am ET

General Than Shwe of Burma, the dour and taciturn leader of one of the
world’s most repressive military regimes, isn’t known for his feminine
side. His contempt for pro-democracy leader Aung San Suu Kyi is rooted
in part, most Burma analysts say, to the fact that she is a woman.

And so many Burmese were baffled earlier this month when Than Shwe and
other top generals, appearing at a nationally televised ceremony, shed
their dress uniforms for the Burmese equivalent of women’s dresses. "I
don’t understand why the generals were wearing women’s [sarongs] but
they looked very weird," said a Rangoon mechanic, Myint Oo. Others put
a more sinister spin on the generals’ sartorial selection. "It’s
yadaya," said a Rangoon-based astrologer who asked not to be named,
referring to Burma’s particular brand of black magic.
==================================================================================

Dear Myanmar Myo Chits, Patriots, and Friends,

The question is how can TIME Magazin print it or publish it without
checking it? Is there any ethic at all. It is the “ press freedom ”.
If it is politic, if it is Freedom they  “stinks”. This is a pure
insult to the whole nation of Myanmars , the great insult to the whole
population of Myanmars . It is done delibrately.

But , on the other hand,  glad to know that mad cow disease virus is
hitting the brain of some westerners. It may be because they eat too
much beef steak. What sad aboutthis is some Myanmars are also
suffering from this disease, because they eat the shit and drink the
piss of the westerners,

Look at this discussion forum.  How many of them are discussing the
issues, the real issues of Myanmar. For the future of Maynmar and its
people. Some foreigners as well, and those so called Myanmars who are
half breed , or crossed breed, or mongrels, sons and daughters of ,
father is a fugitive and mother is a whore.

Myanmar are being denied almost everything for their progress, for
their developments to have better life , to have modern standard of
living, or to put it in another way, to be real human beings.

The people of Myanmars and the nation of Myanmar are the victims,
because some of our own people do not know what they are saying or
doing. Let‘s put it politely that way. .

The people of Myanmars are not locked inside, they are free to go
about, around the word if they can afford. Learn and educated
themselves at least for themselves. Serving the people and serving the
nations is the option. That how free they are .  There are lots of
Myanmars patriots , who would gladly serve the people and the nation.

Let me use the word, which everyone can understand . The ‘economic
sanctions’ imposed on Myanmar,  that means the West is violating the
human rights of the Myanmars. A shrimp can understand that. Some of
our Myanmars are conspiring with the west on their own Myanmar people.

But unfortunately, some Myanmar brain are noit developing, not
functioning properly, they are “ kapute ”.

Myanmar saying for these Myanmars is , “ Thakin Arhya – Kyun Bar Wa
”.
These Myanmars are nothing but dogs that waggling tail to please its
master.
When you ask, “ how much is that doggy on the window ?”. Te dog can
only reply, “ woof, woof.” nothing else. Because the dog cannot talk
back.

Human rights of Myanmars are not denied by the government of Rep. of
Union of Myanmar, but by the West. Because the government of Rep. of
Union of Myanmar is not a puppet, nor a poodle government of the West.
It is the government of a Free, Independent , Sovereign Nation of
Myanmars.

But , I cannot say there is nobody who wants to be a puppet , or a
poodle of the west or because they are afraid of a pack of blood
hounds led by the Hound Dog of the Baskerville (United States of
America ).

We all are here to witness the truth, yet , who knows what is the
truth . The ignorant will never know what is truth. Ignorant is
ignorant, because he chooses to be ignorant, as his right.

How can they be so ignorant ? Their parents, their teachers, their up
bringing.

I have read in the Times magazine and article, “Why Did Burma’s Leader
Appear on TV in Women’s Clothes? By ROBERT HORN / BANGKOK.  That
shows, not only Myanmars but also the foreigners are also ignorant. I
can understand the writer may be a foreigner, because he is carrying a
foreign name .

 But I can not and will never  understand those so called Myanmars who
were helping Robert as translator, or interpreter.  How can these
Myanmars be so low ? How can these Myanmars be so ignorant of their
own country, their own people, their own culture, tradition, customs
and way of life?   I hope this mo mechanic Myint U not ese Myanmars
wearing the “ Lan Kutt Ti ” or Loin Clothe like Tarzan of the Apes in
the Jungle, not Pasoe ( sarong ) while they were talking to Robert
Horn. Making “ Myanmar National Dress ” not worth a penny.

I pity these Myanmars. That may be , “Thakin Arhya – Kyun Bar Wa ” . “
Aphu Myin Mha – Luu Htin ” only the whites are the human  for these
Myanmars . That is if they are Myanmars. They may be the maggots. In
this case they are.

You see, that is what I mean by “ Be Thu Mapyu – Mi Mi Mhu ”, you reap
what you sowed. Robert will say he wrote what Myanmars told him, and
get away.

Regards,

Mogyothwar.

More lawsuits loom for archdiocese

By John P. Martin, Inquirer Staff Writer
Philadelphia Inquirer
Friday, March 4, 2011

Lawyers say they will file a new lawsuit Monday accusing Archdiocese
of Philadelphia, its leaders and employees of conspiracy and fraud
for failing to help a former young sacristan who claimed he was
abused by a priest.

The claim would be the second of its kind since a Philadelphia grand
jury last month charged four priests with molesting boys or
concealing the attacks, and said the archdiocese attempts to reform
had fallen short.

"This is yet another case in which the victim’s assistance program
didn’t really do what it was supposed to do," said Marci Hamilton,
one of the lawyers for the plaintiff.

More at:
http://articles.philly.com/2011-03-04/news/28653480_1_grand-jury-repo…

Jai Maharaj, Jyotishi
Om Shanti

     o  Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
     o  If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
     o  Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster who may or may not have read the article.

FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a ‘fair use’ of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to:  http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond ‘fair use’, you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.

Since newsgroup posts are being removed
by forgery by one or more net terrorists,
this post may be reposted several times.

On Mar 5, 3:48 pm, RichAsianKid <RichAsian…@hotmail.com> wrote:

.> CCP will not relinquish control any time soon.
.>

Is there a valid reason why the Chinese political leaders
must relinquish the power to rule ?

The people in China do not have the same view on
politics as Westerners…mob rule (popular rule)

Most Chinese  expect their leaders to give them
peace, stability…and economic prosperity…so that
they could get out of poverty…and have a decent life.

As long as China is prosperous….they is no reason
why the Chinese will topple their leaders.

- — -

> (Japanese Ambassador agrees
>    http://mdn.mainichi.jp/mdnnews/news/20110302p2g00m0dm018000c.html)

> ——
> China places stability, strength above all
> By Bill Schiller
> Asia Bureau
> Toronto Star
> March 04, 2011

> BEIJING Compared to the conflict and chaos spilling into the streets of
> north Africa and the Middle East, the scene that will unfold Saturday at
> Beijing s Great Hall of the People promises to be positively sublime.

> The opening of the National People s Congress China s rubber-stamp
> legislature is a festive, annual rite of spring in the Chinese
> capital, providing a platform for the country s rulers to highlight
> successes of the past year and to lay out plans for more.

> It s as close as one gets to a binding political moment in China part
> state of the union, part throne speech.

> With the advisory People s Consultative Conference also meeting, Beijing
> will host 10 days of Communist Party hoopla and policy discussion.

> But this year s conferences are likely to be more: a forum to reflect on
> the fruits of China s stability.

> As riots rock successive countries abroad and economies go up in smoke,
> China remains comparatively calm and its leaders assert prosperity
> has been the result.

> In the Communist Party playbook stability trumps all; with it, China s
> leaders have been able to deliver the goods in the form of decades of
> double-digit growth.

> On Saturday Premier Wen Jiabao is likely to introduce a new five-year
> plan that will aim to moderate growth and stimulate spending.

> But the real significance of the gathering goes far beyond spreadsheets
> and spending plans: it s a stage from which to trumpet the success of
> the Chinese Model, one that puts economics before any notion of
> individual rights.

> As much as anything else, this week s conferences will project the power
> and competence of the Communist Party of China.

> As American power and international status wanes and other countries
> find themselves embroiled in homegrown uprisings, China continues to
> gather strength and so, of course, does its ruling party.

> It wasn t supposed to be like this at least according to Western thinking.

> Academics and politicians have long predicted that China will eventually
> turn toward Western democracy. But that hasn t happened not yet.
> Today, such predictions seem to be receding into the landscape and might
> be approaching the vanishing point.

> In today s China, according to author Richard McGregor, whose recent
> book The Party is the definitive work on China s rulers, the freedom to
> consume . . . is much more attractive than vague notions of democracy.

> China s rulers have been able to provide what McGregor and others call
> market Leninism, an innovative mix of market principles and Leninist
> control.

> People are given enough space to get ahead, he points out, provided they
> steer clear of any notion of democratic politics.

> The idea that China would one day become a democracy was always a
> Western notion, born of theories about how political systems evolve,
> McGregor wrote recently in Foreign Policy. Yet all evidence so far
> suggests these theories are wrong.

> The international financial crisis of 2008 ultimately proved to be a
> shot in the arm for the party, McGregor said in a telephone interview
> Thursday.

> The financial crisis was just a killer for the western brand in China
> and a godsend for the party leadership because, essentially, all their
> propaganda about the West came through.

> Since then, the party hasn t looked back.

> Today it is stronger and more powerful than ever, McGregor says. But
> they are also still deeply, deeply insecure.

> Some of that insecurity was on display Sunday when the Chinese
> government sent legions of police into the streets of central Beijing to
> quell what they thought could be serious anti-government rally,
> triggered by an online call for the Chinese to emulate Tunisia s Jasmine
> Revolution.

> The rally never really materialized, but numbers of foreign journalists
> were roughed up, knocked to the ground, detained and a couple seriously
> beaten.

> It might have been a massive overreaction, McGregor observes, but I
> guess that s part of their strength.

> There are many other strengths underlining the party s intention not
> just to survive, but thrive.

> Over the years the party has built what appears to be an insurmountable
> bulwark against all comers, says McGregor.

> As he sees it, they have emasculated all political rivals, eliminated
> the independence of the courts and the media, reined in religion and
> civil society, denigrated other versions of nationhood, consolidated all
> political power, expanded the security police and put dissidents behind
> bars.

> One might call these the Seven Steps to Invincibility.

> Will the Chinese Communist Party rule forever, McGregor is asked?

> Certainly for the foreseeable future, he says.

> Link:http://www.thestar.com/news/world/article/948393–china-places-stabil…

Everything you always wanted to know about India and more

India’s Superpower Euphoria CCLXXI
http://cogitoergosum.co.cc/2011/03/01/indias-superpower-euphoria-cclxxi/

Contradiction

Godhra case: Court to pronounce quantum of punishment
Press Trust Of India

Ahmedabad, March 01, 2011

First Published: 09:01 IST(1/3/2011)
Last Updated: 09:13 IST(1/3/2011)

A special court is likely to pronounce today the quantum of punishment
for the 31 convicts in the 2002 Godhra train burning incident that
killed 59 people and triggered large scale communal violence in
Gujarat. Designated judge P R Patel hearing the case inside the
Sabarmati Central Jail would prono

unce the quantum of punishment to those who were found guilty of
criminal conspiracy and murder on Tuesday.

The prosecution has sought death sentence for all the 31 convicts
saying that it was a heinous act.

While the defence lawyers had pleaded leniency for the accused and
requested the court to take into consideration their role during the
incident, and considering their past record, family circumstances and
time spent in jail since their arrest.

The court has accepted the prosecution’s contention that there was a
conspiracy behind the incident and convicted 31 under various sections
of Indian Penal Code (IPC) like 302 (murder), 307 (attempt to murder)
and 120B(criminal conspiracy).

They have also been convicted under IPC section 147, 148 (rioting with
deadly weapons), 323, 324,325,326 (causing hurt), 153A (promoting
enmity between different groups on religious grounds), various
sections of the Indian Railways Act, Prevention of Damages to Public
Property Act and Bombay Police Act.

The Court on February 22 had acquitted 63 others, in the burning of
S-6 coach of Sabarmati Express in 2002 near Godhra railway station
where 59 persons were killed.

Following the Godhra train burning incident on February 27, 2002,
large scale communal violence had broken out in various parts of
Gujarat in which over 1000 people died, mainly belonging to the
minority community.

Revisiting two Godhra panels
Mahesh Langa, Hindustan Times
Ahmedabad, February 24, 2011

First Published: 00:40 IST(24/2/2011)
Last Updated: 01:09 IST(24/2/2011)

4 Comments

After bloody riots broke out in Gujarat following the train-burning
incident on February 27, 2002, the Narendra Modi government, under
attack for having allegedly abetted the communal disturbances,
announced an inquiry commission to probe the event. On March 6, the
state set up a commission of enqui

ry headed by retired Gujarat high court judge KG Shah to enquire into
the Godhra train burning and the subsequent violence, and submit a
report in three months.

Following criticism from NGOs, activists and parties over Shah’s
alleged proximity to the BJP, on May 22, the government reconstituted
the commission, appointing retired Supreme Court judge GT Nanavati to
lead the commission.

In September 2008, the commission submitted its part one report
related to the train-burning incident at Godhara.

The commission has recently got its 15th extension and is now mandated
to submit its second part report by July this year.

Banerjee panel: After the Congress-led UPA came to power at the Centre
following the BJP-led NDA’s defeat in the parliamentary polls,
railways minister Lalu Prasad in September 2004 appointed a panel
headed by former Supreme Court judge UC Banerjee to probe the Godhra
train fire incident. However, Godhra train carnage victim Nilkanth
Bhatia and the Gujarat government challenged the formation of the
committee at the high court, which ruled in October 2006 that the
formation of the committee was illegal and was in violation of the
Commissions of inquiry Act, 1952, which prohibits the setting up of
separate commissions by governments, state or central, to probe a
matter of public importance.

http://www.hindustantimes.com/Images/HTEditImages/Images/24_02_11-met…

The high court also declared the report submitted by the committee
null and void and restrained the Centre from tabling the report in
Parliament. The Centre’s appeal challenging the high court ruling is
pending for four years at Gujarat high court.

Showing 4 comments

*

Sid Harth 0 minutes ago

Railways fall under the central government jurisdiction, not the state
government. All crimes, including accidents happening on railways
platforms, on the rail tracks, rail yards, railways workshops,
factories manufacturing railway compartments and related equipments
are central government’s sole jurisdiction. Railways conduct their own
enquieries. In one unfortunate accident in the time of Nehru
government, Lal Bahadur Shastri, the then Railway minister resigned.
There are proper procedures, well established and accepted by laws of
the land and precedence over the years since the British rule have
taken decisions based on internal enquieries. What is wrong, then,
that U C Banerjee commission arriving at the conclusion that no
conspiracy was involved but a spontenious, though most unfortunate
conflict arising from the minor issue of proper service/respect shown
by the Muslim vendors and the Karsevaks on that fateful night. Gujarat
government led by Narendra Modi has shown extreme apathy towards the
subsequent carnage by Hindus. If not managed but surely controlled
with the local police and other law enforcement personnel who remained
passive towards Hindu hooligans looking for the extreme and most
brutal retaliation. Narendra Modi may be innocent but he did condoned
the Hindu atrocities then and long after. His Gujarati book on this
subject admits the Hindu carnage but justifies it as a proper, though
emotional response. He used all methods and means to prevent state and
national authorities to determine the truth on one or other excuse.
Narendra Modi is morally responsible for the subsequent tragedy if not
for the original outrage at the station.

*

Sahana 3 days ago

Conveniently forget to mention that the Court declared UC Banerjee
Commission to be illegal and a sham?

1 person liked this.
*

sharada 4 days ago

Banerjee must be trailed now. sure he ate S### of lallu…

1 person liked this.
*

witan 5 days ago

The only purpose of this story seems to be to create a false
impression that UC Banerjee committee was superior to the Nanavati
COMMISSION, and that UC Banerjee’s fictional “findings” are superior
to the recenly delivered verdict of the Special Court. Will HT never
learn to act in a responsible and decent way!

4 people liked this.

Not in the balance

Anil Dharker, Hindustan Times
February 28, 2011

First Published: 22:50 IST(28/2/2011)
Last Updated: 22:52 IST(28/2/2011)

Just a few days ago, separate courts gave their verdicts in two
important cases. In Mumbai, the Bombay high court confirmed the death
sentence on 26/11 terrorist Ajmal Kasab while a day later in
Ahmedabad, a special court held 31 people guilty of burning a coach of
the Sabarmati Express at Godhra
railway station in 2002.

There are subtexts in both these judgements. In the Kasab trial, the
high court upheld the acquittal of two Indians accused of being part
of the Lashkar-e-Tayyeba (LeT). In the Godhra court, the sessions
judge acquitted 63 people — more than double the number convicted, for
lack of evidence. These sub-texts tell their own story, a story that
does not speak well of many of our institutions.

Take the Kasab case first. The only surviving member of the Pakistani
terrorist team that attacked Mumbai in 2008, he has been lodged in a
high security cell with no expense spared on looking after him. In
spite of his indisputable guilt, the prosecution produced over 600
eyewitnesses to buttress its open-and-shut case, thus delaying it for
over two years. But the message India wanted to give the world is that
our laws are fair, there are no distinctions between people. The
acquittal of the two Indians accused of abetting the conspiracy,
further reinforces that claim.

If only the Godhra verdict did so too! On the face of it, the
judgement seems to contradict itself. As we now know, 31 people were
convicted for criminal conspiracy, while 63 were acquitted.
Significantly of the 63, there were two people, Maulvi Hussain Umarji
and the then president of the municipality, Billal Hussain Kalota, who
were accused to be the main conspirators. If your main conspirators
are innocent, how can you have a conspiracy?

As it happens, the whole Godhra story is shrouded in confusion, with
three theories emerging from the scenario. The first theory is that
the fire started from inside the coach. This is not entirely
implausible, because the coach was grossly over-crowded and on a long
journey many people travel with stoves and beddings which make for a
lethal combination. The second is that the conration began after a
spontaneous fight erupted between the Hindu kar sevaks on the train
and Muslim vendors on the platform, a culmination of days of tension
between the two. In this confrontation, stones and burning rags were
thrown and the latter started the fire in the compartment. The third
theory is that the burning of the compartment was a result of a pre-
planned conspiracy.

The court has upheld the last theory even while freeing Umarji and
Kalota. This is the theory that suits the Modi-led BJP government, as
the crowing reaction of a party spokesman to the verdict showed. It
suits the party because it acts as some sort of justification for the
days of state-abetted carnage that followed in Gujarat which killed
1,800 people. This is also the theory supported by the Nanavati
commission appointed by the Gujarat government in 2002.

A second commission headed by another former Supreme court judge (UC
Banerjee), which was appointed in 2004 by Lalu Prasad as railway
minister when the UPA government came to power in Delhi, contradicted
this saying that the fire in the coach started accidentally from
inside. It based its findings on forensic evidence and accounts of
railway
…

ITEM:
December, 2010 headline: Prof: Hispanics should replace ‘old white men’
http://www.wnd.com/?pageId=239797

ITEM: "Tough Times for Older Male Workers"

    "In previous recessions, veteran workers were
     largely spared the pain of widespread job
     cutbacks, according to Bureau of Labor
     Statistics data. Layoffs tended to be
     concentrated among younger workers: The
     younger you were, the more likely you were
     to get fired. Traditional, bread-winning
     older males — especially white men — were
     the least vulnerable.
     Not so today …"

http://www.usatoday.com/money/economy/employment/2009-07-29-oldermales_N
.htm

ITEM:

from: "SHARING THE BURDEN?
The Impact of Proposed Teacher Layoffs Across LAUSD"

    "Many schools serving low-income communities
     of color have worked hard to recruit and
     develop new teachers with the skills and
     commitment to be successful in these communities."

    [Translation: "Many schools in communities swarming
     with illegal aliens and anchor babies -- which
     quite literally means over 95% of the L.A. school
     schools -- have, for over a decade, been on a
     crusade to hire non-white teachers (especially
     anchor babies right out of college) because the
     students in the district's anchor-baby-dominated
     schools supposedly have a "right" to be taught by
     teachers who are of the same race -- hispanic and,
     to a much, much lesser extent, black. -- GWF]

Source: http://idea.gseis.ucla.edu/publications/files/Layoffs-LAUSD.pdf

  It’s often said that many of the new trends which first arise in
California eventually spread to the other 49 states of the union.

  If true, then it behooves non-"minority" Americans in the rest of the
country to pay attention to recent developments in the Los Angeles
school district, the 2nd-largest school district in the nation.

  As can be read about via the link providedin the first "ITEM" above,
a judge recently ruled that "minority" students (which, in the context
of Los Angeles and most California cities today, typically equates to
"hispanic") are some sort of "protected class" and, as a result, their
teachers (who are largely just-out-of-college hispanics) should receive
a new type of "Affirmative Action" benefit when layoffs must be made by
the school district.

  In sum, what the Left is stealthily pushing is an agenda in which
"old white men" (to quote a speaker at a recent La Raza hatefest) with
many years of teaching experience and seniority will be laid-off while
23-year-old recent college graduate hispanics will keep their jobs,
their lack of experience and lack of seniority be damned.

  WARNING: I fully expect this ploy to be tried throughout the country
in the near future. Of course, the Left will never, ever state the
obvious concerning its plans as I have just done; namely, that
scrapping the traditional — and just — American policy of "last
hired, first fired" is all about REPLACING WHITE EMPLOYEES WITH
NON-WHITE (ESPECIALLY HISPANIC) EMPLOYEES.

  Essentially, whites will be expected to pay for (through their taxes)
their own dispossession: Whites will be systematically laid-off while
young, no-experience, no-seniority hispanics keep their jobs. Whites
will be expected to sheepishly pay for public schools and the salaries
of their non-white teachers, yet the same whites whose taxes fund the
schools will be excluded from working in the very same schools.

  A wise man has said,

         "When people have lost everything and have
          nothing less to lose, they lose it."

  I believe that if the above-described movement — aided and abetted
by the Obama Administration and its whigger-talking Education Secretary
Arne Duncan (ever heard him speak? he sounds like comedian Jamie
Kennedy doing his whigger routine!) and its main pillar, the
America-hating Left — gains momentum the "people who have lost
everything" (such as their occupations, be it teacher, police officer,
nurse or any other kind of employee) all due to an ugly Leftist scheme
to essentially "genocide" whites in the workplace, that it will not be
surprising if droves of the America-haters’ victims start to "lose it."

++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

      What Would America’s Founders Say?

  The two enemies of the people are criminals
  and government, so let us tie the second down
  with the chains of the Constitution so the
  second will not become the legalized version
  of the first.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Those who hammer their guns into plows will
  plow for those who do not.
   –Thomas Jefferson

  It does not take a majority to prevail … but
  rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on
  setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of
  men.
  –Samuel Adams

  The strongest reason for the people to retain
  the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last
  resort, to protect themselves against tyranny
  in government.
  — Thomas Jefferson

   A free people ought not only to be armed and
   disciplined, but they should have sufficient
   arms and ammunition to maintain a status of
   independence from any who might attempt to
   abuse them, which would include their own
   government."
   – George Washington

  No free man shall ever be debarred the use of arms.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  If the freedom of speech is taken away then
  dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to
  the slaughter.
  — George Washington

  When governments fear the people there is liberty.
  When the people fear the government there is tyranny.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Laws that forbid the carrying of arms… Disarm only
  those who are neither inclined nor determined to
  commit crimes.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Oppressors can tyrannize only when they achieve a
   standing army, an enslaved press, and a disarmed
   populace.
    — James Madison

  If the representatives of the people betray
  their constituents, there is then no resource
  left but in the exertion of that original
  right of self-defense which is paramount to
  all positive forms of government … The
  citizens must rush tumultuously to arms,
  without concert, without system, without
  resource; except in their courage and despair
  … The natural strength of the people in a
  large community, in proportion to the artificial
  strength of the government, is greater than in a
  small … the people, without exaggeration, may
  be said to be entirely the masters of their own fate.
  — Alexander Hamilton

  All tyranny needs to gain a foothold is for people
  of good conscience to remain silent.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Every government degenerates when trusted to the
  rulers of the people alone. The people themselves
  are its only safe depositories.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  As our enemies have found we can reason like men,
  so now let us show them we can fight like men also.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Do you want to know who you are? Don’t ask. Act!
  Action will delineate and define you.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Merchants have no country. The mere spot they
  stand on does not constitute so strong an
  attachment as that from which they draw their gains.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  I hope we shall crush in its birth the aristocracy
  of our monied corporations which dare already to
  challenge our government to a trial by strength,
  and bid defiance to the laws of our country.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  I believe that banking institutions are more
  dangerous to our liberties than standing armies.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  Experience hath shewn, that even under the best
  forms of government those entrusted with power
  have, in time, and by slow operations, perverted
  it into tyranny.
  — Thomas Jefferson

  A Founding Father speaks out on what’s nowadays
  called "political correctness":

  Do not suffer yourselves to be wheeled out of
  your liberty to publish by any pretenses of
  politeness, delicacy or decency. These, as they
  are so often used, are but three different names
  for hypocrisy, chicanery and cowardice.
  –John Adams
—